<code id='AE00CA5909'></code><style id='AE00CA5909'></style>
    • <acronym id='AE00CA5909'></acronym>
      <center id='AE00CA5909'><center id='AE00CA5909'><tfoot id='AE00CA5909'></tfoot></center><abbr id='AE00CA5909'><dir id='AE00CA5909'><tfoot id='AE00CA5909'></tfoot><noframes id='AE00CA5909'>

    • <optgroup id='AE00CA5909'><strike id='AE00CA5909'><sup id='AE00CA5909'></sup></strike><code id='AE00CA5909'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='AE00CA5909'><label id='AE00CA5909'><select id='AE00CA5909'><dt id='AE00CA5909'><span id='AE00CA5909'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='AE00CA5909'></u>
          <i id='AE00CA5909'><strike id='AE00CA5909'><tt id='AE00CA5909'><pre id='AE00CA5909'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          1. 墨韵云栈首页
          2. 探索

          乌外和案交换拒庭解光大证据证券龙指

            投资者诉光大证券(行情,乌龙指 问诊)内幕交易索赔案10日在上海市第二中级人民法院进行证据交换,光大证券代理方拒绝庭外和解。案交

            原告方的换证和解代理律师、上海华荣律师事务所合伙人许峰表示,据光此案共有16位原告,大证包括购买股票、券拒基金及股指期货的庭外投资者,因“乌龙指”造成其分别在ETF和样本股、乌龙指股指期货上出现不同程度的案交亏损,索赔金额共计200万元左右。换证和解

            据介绍,据光证据交换后,大证本案将择期在上海市二中院开庭审理。券拒

          庭外标签:庭外和解|上海市|投资者责任编辑:杜思思 杜思思

          本文链接: http://iarnhvtu.impactiveimprints.com/news/03b36399633.html (转载请保留)

          作者:墨韵云栈,如若转载,请注明出处:http://iarnhvtu.impactiveimprints.com/news/03b36399633.html